Judge’s ruling could require boat pollution permits

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — A ruling by a judge in California could impact all boat owners in Alaska, except the military.

The ruling could mean that thousands of recreational and commercial boat owners will have to get water-pollution permits to discharge deck runoff, bilge water and many other kinds of liquids off their boats.

For more than 30 years, small boats have been exempt from such permits, which the federal Environmental Protection Agency routinely approves for large-scale polluters such as seafood processors and wastewater treatment plants.

The small boat owners, however, become entangled in a court case that environmental groups, six states and others filed against the EPA over ballast-water discharges from large ships.

The litigants were trying to force the EPA to issue permits for ships’ ballast-water discharges, which have introduced many invasive aquatic species to the U.S. coastline and the Great Lakes, according to federal scientists.

The Northern California district judge in the case declined to limit her ruling to ballast water. She threw out the Clean Water Act’s exemption for water-discharge permits for many routine emissions from boats.

Some of the more harmful pollutants introduced by boats into oceans and rivers, such as trash and human waste, are regulated under other rules.

So far, the EPA has identified 143,000 commercial vessels and up to 18 million recreational boats that could now require pollution permits under the court ruling.

State records show about 69,000 boats registered with the Alaska Division of Motor Vehicles.

The EPA is appealing the district court ruling and oral arguments are scheduled before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Aug. 14. The EPA has until September 2008 to impose the new permits under the lower court ruling.

One of the Pacific Coast commercial fishing groups that petitioned the EPA to beef up its ballast-water regulations said Thursday he is concerned that the decision is now being applied to small-boat owners.

“This could be extremely onerous when the discharges are essentially benign,” said Zeke Grader, executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman’s Associations.

Requiring a permit for deck runoff and bilge water sounds nuts, said Tom Garrett, an Anchorage small recreational boat owner.

“You can’t regulate everything in this country,” he said.


Information from: Anchorage Daily News,


<!– –>

This entry was posted in Conservation. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Judge’s ruling could require boat pollution permits

  1. Oh, but they try.
    *sigh* Isn’t it interesting that a California judge can set aside exemptions in an act that was approved by voters?
    How typical.

  2. opilia says:

    *sigh* is right

  3. Meghan Hause says:

    This sounds like government that is trying to once again to restrick the fishing lifestyle. I can understand permits for ships’ ballast-water discharges with international ships, because they go to another waters and can pick up alien species, but with recreational and commercial boat owners, a good majority of them don’t leave other waters.

    What the deal with permits for deck run off, most of the stuff that run of decks is water and blood from buttered fish, which won’t hurt the enivorment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s